Thoughts on the Craig-Tabash debate

When I originally linked to the Craig-Tabash debate, I thought I'd do a full commentary like I did for Lowder-Fernandes, but Richard Carrier has already written a commentary, which I largely agree with. I just have one point in response to Richard's comments.

Carrier says:

Even many theists were disappointed in Craig, whose arguments were often poorly constructed or outright fallacious, and they credited Tabash, who certainly made several good arguments that were not addressed, or only ineptly, with the win.

Craig used the same basic arguments for his position that he always uses (Kalaam and thre resurrection), so I don't think this is where the problem is supposed to be. I think, then, Carrier is refering to Tabash's attacks on Hell, Biblical attrocities, and the supernatural. Frankly, I don't see how Craig could have done better here. If the "theists" who Carrier mentions as giving the victory to Tabash are really evangelical Christians, we've got a case of evangelicals admitting their doctrines are indefensible.