At Hell's Handmaiden, there's a one-sentence post that says, "Not all conspiracy theorists are easily brushed aside as crazy." This sentence links to a Washington Post article on a 9/11 conspiracy theorist.
Now, the fascinating thing about this post is that it pronounces a position reasonable solely on the basis of a favorable WaPo article. The Post also wrote a favorable article on creationist and HIV-denier Philip Johnson. Is that evidence that his position is reasonable?
Actually, though, the article isn't too favorable. On pages 4-5 debunk one major claim of the movie Lose Change, that some supposed hijackers are still alive.