A transcript is now available. I'll have commentary available later. For now, I will say that Ehrman outperformed Ludemann and Crossan.
Oh, and is there any chance of an audio being made available? I'd like to hear that. In the transcript, Craig comes off as obnoxious and Ehrman seems fairly polite in response, at least at first. But I'd like to be able to hear the voices of the speakers.
3 comments:
Perhaps you can please post my debate on the resurrection of the flesh against Canon Michael Cole on Premier Christian Radio on 15/04/2006?
http://tinyurl.com/krdcq is the link. It is 30 Megabytes so be careful about downloading it.
Oh, and I liked the way Craig ducked the fact that Craig often quotes Tacitus as evidence for Jesus, while Tacitus is also evidence for the miracles of Vespasian.
Perhaps there really is good , historical evidence for non-Christian miracles?
Why does Craig accept Tacitus on Jesus, but not Tacitus on Vespasian?
-----------------
'All flesh is grass' 1 Peter 1:24
I'll take a look this weekend--if I've got the bandwith. I don't have the best internet connection where I'm currently living.
Interestingly, it seems many people now think that the healings of Vespasian happened, but they were psychosomatic. Anthony Flew is one of them; he often brings it up when discussing miracles.
I'm sure Craig would have no objection to people proposing naturalistic explanations for (non-Christian) miracles.
Post a Comment