The Carrier-Licona debate, on the historicity of the resurrection. I got it at Licona's website. There's supposed to be one on Internet Infidels, but I can't find it, and Licona's version includes debates with Dan Barker and a Muslim apologist (the latter may be worth watching for entertainment value, who knows).
Review to follow.
1 comment:
I don't know who Richard Carrier is, but if I were debating, my argument would be that all the evidence points to the non-existence of Jesus, and since he didn't exist, he didn't resurrect. Probably a better person to debate the non-existence of Jesus would be Ken Humphreys or Earl Doherty.
Post a Comment